Arizona DUI Attorneys- Arizona Drunk Driving Lawyers - Arizona DWI Attorneys

Jeffrey S. Siirtola, PC focuses its practice primarily on defending drivers accused of driving under the influence, and puts tremendous time, energy, and expense into defending these types of cases. It is a luxury that few general practice attorneys can afford. We typically defend fifty or more dui clients at any one time, unlike general practitioners who may have four or five dui cases and many more divorces and civil cases.

Nothing else gets in the way of our focus on your case, the investigation and preparation of your case, and striving for the best possible result for each and every one or our driving under the influence clients.

Our lawyers have detailed knowledge and technical training necessary to get excellent results. Our lawyers spend dozens of hours each year increasing their technical and practice skills training throughout the country. Our lawyers write books and other publications on defending the drinking driver. Our lawyers teach and make technical presentations throughout the United States for other lawyers and judges, which place them on the cutting edge. Such cutting edge knowledge is critical to effective representation of our clients in this complex area of the law.

Arizona DUI defense lawyer Jeffrey S. Siirtola

Jeffrey Siirtola is the founder of Jeffrey S. Siirtola, PC. He has practiced law in Arizona since 1987. Eight years ago, Jeffrey made a commitment to get the best technical and DUI defense educational and training, and attended his first summer session of the National College for DUI Defense, Inc. in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Two years ago, Jeffrey focused his practice on DUI defense. His success in defending DUI cases
is recognized within Arizona, by his membership on the DUI Committee of Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice (AACJ). Jeffrey was the first lawyer in Arizona to purchase his own Intoxilyzer breath testing device. He is the only attorney living outside Phoenix and Tucson serving on the statewide Committee.

In 2006, Jeff became the first Arizona DUI lawyer to publish a book for non-lawyer citizens accused
of driving under the influence, intended to assist them from their initial plea of not guilty through the entire unfamiliar process of facing and defending DUI charges: 'A Citizen's Guide to the DUI-DWI
Criminal Justice Process in Arizona.'

Jeffrey Siirtola has attended the National College for DUI Defense (NCDD) summer program taught in
Cambridge, Massachusetts seven (7) times in the last ten (10) years; and the winter program taught at
other locations three times, for a total of ten sessions. This is the premiere educational course
available to attorneys desiring the best instruction in DUI defenses, strategies, and technical
information.

At the national level, Jeffrey received peer recognition two (2) years ago, as a Sustaining Member of
the National College for DUI Defense, Inc., which was presented by his instructors in Cambridge, Massachusetts at a summer session of the National College. In the last three years, Siirtola has been invited to lecture and given technical presentations to DUI defense lawyers in several states as an expert on the Intoxilyzer breath testing devices, jury selection, exclusion of Spanish-speakers and Hispanics from jury panels, and other issues regarding DUI defense in Tucson, Arizona; Tempe ,Arizona; Arlington,Texas; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; West Palm Beach, Florida; and at the Mastering Scientific Evidence (MSE) Seminar taught at Georgia Tech campus in Atlanta, Georgia.

Siirtola is believed to be the only DUI lawyer in Arizona to own four (4) Intoxilyzer breath testing devices;
and the first lawyer to not only receive BAT operators certificates for the Intoxilyzer 5000; the Intoxilyzer 8000; and a practitioner's certificate for National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) standardized field sobriety tests (SFST's) used by law enforcement officers; but also a phlebotomy certificate for proper medical procedures for blood draws.

During our first consultation with you, which is free until you make a decision to hire us, we will
review your questionnaire, advise you of the potential legal consequences of a conviction and
possible SR-22 consequences of a conviction; discuss the facts in your case, options and possibilities
of running specific defenses in your case. Regardless of whether we take on a particular case, the
information we provide, including a potential consequences of conviction chart, is invaluable. Usually,
we will be able to show you exactly what the sentence will be, if you were to show up in court at your initial appearance or arraignment, and say the word 'guilty' in front of the judge, including the penalties and civil MVD consequences of any guilty plea to your charges.

You may be pleasantly surprised at the information we are able to give you, in a first office appointment, at no initial cost.

In addition to a free initial consultation, at the end of your initial office consultation, you may receive a copy of Mr. Siirtola's new book, published in 2006, 'A Citizen's Guide through the DUI-DWI Criminal Justice Process in Arizona,' (First Edition), a $17.95 value, at no additional charge.

Arizona DUI Investigator/Expert Witness Rudolph Fahrner

Rudolph Fahrner is a retired Arizona DPS officer available to clients of Jeffrey S. Siirtola, PC as
a DUI investigator and as an expert witness on the Intoxilyzer 5000 and 8000, field sobriety
testing protocols, and proper maintenance procedures for breath testing devices.

Mr. Fahrner has over 28 years law enforcement experience, including many years as an Arizona State Trooper, and as a Port Inspector for trucks and accident investigator for the State of Arizona. Mr. Fahrner did several hundred DUI investigations; testified for the State of Arizona as an expert witness
(Breath Analyst), following specialized training by Chester Flaxmeyer at State Crime Laboratory
in Phoenix, Arizona; and performed regular maintenance on three Intoxilyzer devices before retiring
from his employment by the State of Arizona.

Rudy Fahrner served as a combat helicopter pilot for the U.S. Marine Corps in Vietnam; and was an
instructor for the Arizona Department of Public Safety in alcohol workshops and specialized law
enforcement report writing.

Mr. Siirtola is the only DUI defense lawyer in Arizona to have made special and exclusive arrangements
to make the services of a retired State Trooper available to his driving under the influence clients in
each and every case.

Call 1-800-DIAL-DUI and enter area code 520 for Tucson DUI Lawyer Jeffrey Siirtola

Area Code 520 Arizona DUI Lawyers : Ajo, Benson, Bisbee, Blackwater, Bowie, Casa Blanca, Casa Grande, Cascabel, Coolidge, Douglas, Elfrida, Eloy, Florence, Hayden, Kitt Peak, Komatke, Lone Butte, Maricopa, Maricopa Village, Nogales, Patagonia, Pearce, Portal, Sacaton, San Manuel, San Simon, Santa Rosa, Sasabe, Sells, Sierra Vista, Stotonic, Sunizona, Superior, Tombstone, Tucson , West San Simon, Whitlow, Willcox; Saguaro N.P., Organ Pipe Cactus N.M.

Defending Arizona DUI Arrests throughout Tucson and Surrounding Communities

1-800-DIAL-DUI (area code 520)

There's a reason that Arizona DUI Attorney Lawyer Jeff Siirtola is a Member of  America's Top DUI & DWI Defense Attorneys TM

Jeff Siirtola Wins Arizona DUI Cases

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas  520) NOW TO TALK TO TUCSON ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY Jeff Siirtola

OR Click Here to Contact ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY Jeff Siirtola :

Read Arizona DUI Lawyer Jeff Siirtola's Answers About Arizona DUI Laws

• Can I fight my Arizona DUI?

Simply speaking, yes. I can review every aspect of the case, from the reason that you were stopped, to the validity of the field sobriety tests, to the maintenance of the breathalyzer machine, to the validity of the results. I will conduct a thorough review of all the facts and laws regarding your Arizona DUI case.

Also, I will discuss the case with the prosecutor and judge, pointing out your background, your job, and the need for you to keep your license.

• What do police officers look for when searching for drunk drivers on the highways ?

The following is a list of symptoms in descending order of probability that the person observed is driving while intoxicated. The list is based upon research conducted by the National Highway Traffic Administration:

(1) Turning with a wide radius
(2) Straddling center of lane marker
(3) "Appearing to be drunk"
(4) Almost striking object or vehicle
(5) Weaving
(6) Driving on other than designated highway
(7) Swerving
(8) Speed more than 10 mph below limit
(9) Stopping without cause in traffic lane
(10) Following too closely
(11) Drifting
(12) Tires on center or lane marker
(13) Braking erratically
(14) Driving into opposing or crossing traffic
(15) Signaling inconsistent with driving actions
(16) Slow response to traffic signals
(17) Stopping inappropriately (other than in lane)
(18) Turning abruptly or illegally
(19) Accelerating or decelerating rapidly
(20) Headlights off
Speeding, incidentally, is not a symptom of DUI; because of quicker judgment and reflexes, it may indicate sobriety.
Back to Top

• 2. In Arizona, if I'm stopped by a police officer and he asks me if I've been drinking, what should I say?
  • In Arizona, you are not required to answer potentially incriminating questions. A polite "I would like to speak with an attorney before I answer any questions" is a good reply. On the other hand, saying that you had one or two beers is not incriminating: it is not sufficient to cause legal intoxication -- and it may explain the odor of alcohol on the breath. However, it is not advisable to admit to any type of drinking.  The reason for this is that once you make this admission the chances are the police officer is eventually going to arrest you for DUI.  The Arizona law forbids impairment to any or slightest degree.  If you have consumed two beers, and it has had an affect on you ,and the prosecutor is able to prove it you could be convicted of DUI.
• Back to Top

CALL 1-800-DIAL-DUI (Areas  520) NOW TO TALK TO TUCSON ARIZONA DUI ATTORNEY Jeff Siirtola

• 3.  Do I have a right to an attorney when I'm stopped by an officer and asked to take a field sobriety test?
  • In Arizona, you do not have the right to consult with an attorney prior to taking field sobriety tests. FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS ARE VOLUNTARY.  This means you don't have to take them.  As a general rule DO NOT take any field sobriety tests, ever, for any reason, even if the police officer says he just wants to see if you are ok to drive.  That is generally B.S.  What he is really doing is looking to arrest you but cannot do so unless he has some evidence that you are DUI.  If the officer says that he will take you to jail if you refuse to take the field sobriety tests, hold out your hands for the handcuffs and tell the officer "Let's go".  The field sobriety tests include the "eye-test" (HGN); the Walk and Turn test; and the One Leg Stand test.
• Back to Top

• 4.  What is the officer looking for during the initial detention at the scene?
  • The traditional symptoms of intoxication taught at the police academies are:
    (1) Flushed face
    (2) Red, watery, glassy and/or bloodshot eyes
    (3) Odor of alcohol on breath
    (4) Slurred speech
    (5) Fumbling with wallet trying to get license
    (6) Failure to comprehend the officer's questions
    (7) Staggering when exiting vehicle
    (8) Swaying/instability on feet
    (9) Leaning on car for support
    (10) Combative, argumentative, jovial or other "inappropriate" attitude
    (11) Soiled, rumpled, disorderly clothing
    (12) Stumbling while walking
    (13) Disorientation as to time and place
    (14) Inability to follow directions
    
• Back to Top

• 5.  What should I do if I'm asked to take field sobriety tests?
  JUST SAY NO!. See number No. 3 Above.
  • There are a wide range of field sobriety tests (FSTs), including heel-to-toe, finger-to-nose, one-leg stand, horizontal gaze nystagmus, alphabet recitation, modified position of attention (Rhomberg), fingers-to-thumb, hand pat, etc. Most officers will use a set battery of three to five such tests.
  • Unlike the chemical test, where refusal to submit may have serious consequences, you are not legally required to take any FSTs. The reality is that officers have usually made up their minds to arrest when they give the FSTs; the tests are simply additional evidence which the suspect inevitably "fails". Thus, in most cases a polite refusal may be appropriate.
• Back to Top

• 6. Why did the officer make me follow a penlight with my eyes to the left and right?
  • This is the " horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN)" test, a relatively recent development in DUI investigation. The officer attempts to estimate the angle at which the eye begins to jerk ("nystagmus" is medical jargon for a distinctive eye oscillation); if this occurs sooner than 45 degrees, it theoretically indicates a blood-alcohol concentration over .05%. The smoothness of the eye's tracking the penlight (or finger or pencil) is also a factor, as is the type of jerking when the eye is as far to the side as it can go.
  • This field sobriety test has proven to be subject to a number of different problems, not the least of which is the non-medically trained officer's ability to recognize nystagmus and estimate the angle of onset. The HGN test is admissible in Arizona only to prove possible impairment of which once source could be alcohol.
• Back to Top

• 7.  Should I agree to take a chemical test? What happens if I don't?
  • In Arizona, the consequences of refusing to submit to a blood, breath or urine test are:
  • (1) In Arizona, your driver's license will be suspended for twelve (12) months.  This may be true even if you are found not guilty of the DUI charge.
  • (2) In Arizona, a refusal is not a separate crime in an of itself. Prosecutors and judges sometimes look at refusal cases in the light that you BAC was really high, which was the reason for the refusal.
  • (3) In Arizona, the fact of refusal can be introduced into evidence as "consciousness of guilt". Of course, the defense is free to offer other reasons for the refusal.
  • Thus, the decision is one of weighing the likelihood of a high blood-alcohol reading against the consequences for refusing. Please see " What is Implied Consent " for more information.
• Back to Top

• 8.  Do I have a choice of chemical tests? Which should I choose?
  • In Arizona, you have no choice.  The police officer decides which test to give you.  What test is given is in large part dependent on the police department and their policies. For example, the Tucson Police Department generally uses a breath test.  However, sometimes they will have a "trained" police officer to take blood.  The Oro Valley, Arizona Police use exclusively blood tests. 
  • Also, the test given is dependent on the circumstances of the case.  For example if there was an vehicle accident with bodily injury, the police would ask for a blood test. 
  • Analysis of a blood sample is potentially the most accurate. Breath machines are susceptible to a number of problems rendering them often unreliable. The least accurate by far, however, is urinalysis.
• Back to Top

• 9.  The officer never gave me a "Miranda" warning: Can I get my case dismissed?
  • No. The officer is supposed to give a 5th Amendment warning, your "Miranda" rights, after he arrests you. Often, however, they do not. The only consequence is that the prosecution cannot use any of your answers to questions asked by the police after the arrest.
  • Of more consequence in most cases is the failure to advise you of the state's " implied consent " law - that is, your legal obligation to take a chemical test and the results if you refuse. This can effect the suspension of your license.
• Back to Top

• 10.  Why am I being charged with TWO crimes?
  • The traditional offense is "driving under the influence of alcohol" (DUI), or in some states, "operating while intoxicated" (OWI), or "driving while intoxicated" (DWI). In recent years, however, 48 states have also enacted a second, so-called "per se" offense: driving with an excessive blood-alcohol concentration (either .08% or .10%). In those states, BOTH offenses are charged. The defendant can even be convicted of both, but can be punished for only one.
  • If the case involves a refusal to submit to chemical testing, of course, only the traditional offense will be charged.
• Back to Top

• 11. The officer took my license and served me with a notice of suspension after the breath test: How can he do that if I'm presumed innocent?
  • Agreed, it is blatantly unfair. But the law in most states having a "per se" statute (see question #10) provides for immediate suspension and confiscation of the license if the breath test result is above the legal limit (or, in the case of a blood or urine test, if the officer reasonably believes the result will be above the limit).
  • Warning: Be aware of a 10-day deadline for calling the California DMV to request a hearing on the suspension and to get an extension of the temporary license.
• Back to Top

• 12.  Can I represent myself? What can a lawyer do for me?
  • You can represent yourself -- although it is not a good idea. "Drunk driving" is a very complex field with increasingly harsh consequences. There is a minefield of complicated procedural, evidentiary, constitutional, sentencing and administrative license issues.
  • What can a lawyer do? Nothing (or worse) if he is not qualified in this highly specialized field -- no more than a family doctor could help with brain surgery. A qualified attorney, however, can review the case for defects, suppress evidence, compel discovery of such things as calibration and maintenance records for the breath machine, have blood samples independently analyzed, negotiate for a lesser charge or reduced sentence, obtain expert witnesses for trial, contest the administrative license suspension, etc.
• Back to Top

• 13.  How can I find a qualified drunk driving lawyer?
  • The best way to find a good DUI/DWI lawyer is by reputation. There are a few attorneys who have national reputations; these, of course, are expensive. Thus, the best approach is to ask other attorneys in the jurisdiction: Who is the best in the area? If you do not know any attorneys, go to the local courthouse and ask bailiffs, clerks and public defenders: Who would THEY go to if arrested for drunk driving?
  • Contrary to popular belief, it is not a wise idea to obtain a referral from the local Bar association or referral service. There are rarely any qualifications required for an attorney to be on a referral list; he usually only has to ask to be placed on it. When you call, you are simply given the next name on that list.
  • An excellent indication of quality and experience is membership in the National College for DUI Defense. Completion of that organization's intensive three-day seminar presented at Harvard Law School every year is another clear sign of expertise. Board-certification by the College, however, is the highest level of recognition.
  • When you meet with the attorney, make sure of three things:
  • (1) He has extensive experience in DUI/DWI litigation;
  • (2) He has a reputation for going to trial in appropriate cases, rather than
    just "copping out" his clients;
  • (3) The financial terms of representation are clear.
  • Caution: Beware of lawyers claiming to be experts in the field who simply refer you to other "top DUI lawyers" for a fee.
• Back to Top

• 14.  What will it cost to get a lawyer?
  • This varies, of course, by the reputation and experience of the lawyer and by the geographic location. As with doctors, generally, the more skilled the attorney and the larger the city, the higher the fee. A related factor is the amount of time a lawyer devotes to his cases: the better lawyers take fewer clients, spending more hours on each.
  • The range of fees is huge. A general practitioner in a small community may charge only $500-1000; a DUI specialist with a national reputation may charge up to $15,000 or more, depending on the facts. In addition, the fee may vary by such other factors as:
  • (1) Is the offense a misdemeanor or felony?
  • (2) If prior convictions are alleged, the procedures for attacking them may add to the cost.
  • (3) The fee may or may not include trial or appeals.
  • (4) Administrative license suspension procedures may also be extra.
  • (5) The lawyer may charge a comprehensive fixed fee, or he may ask for a retainer in advance -- to be applied against hourly charges.
  • (6) Costs such as expert witness fees, independent blood analysis, service of subpoenas, etc., may be extra.
  • Whatever the fee quoted, you can ask for a written agreement. And make sure you understand all the terms.
• Back to Top

• 15.  What is the punishment for drunk driving?
  • Again, this varies according to the laws of the state and the customs of the local jurisdiction. Generally speaking, a conviction for a first offense may involve a fine, a license suspension or restriction, attendance at a DUI education course for a period of time, and probation for perhaps three years. A short jail sentence may or may not be required; for a second offense, it almost certainly will. Additional punishment may involve community service, ignition interlock devices, AA meetings, and/or impounding of the vehicle. Arizona DUI Sentencing Chart & Penalty
• Back to Top

• 16.  What is a sentence "enhancement"?
  • Most states increase the punishment in drunk driving cases if certain facts exist. The most common of these is an earlier conviction for the same or a similar offense -- usually within five or seven years of the current offense. Other commonly encountered enhancements (which must usually be alleged in the complaint) include:
  • (1) A child was in the car at the time.
  • (2) The defendant was traveling 20 or 30 miles over the speed limit at the time.
  • (3) The blood-alcohol concentration was over .20%.
  • (4) The defendant refused to submit to a chemical test.
  • (5) There was property damage or injury.
  • (6) The defendant was under 21 ("zero tolerance" laws commonly require a much lower blood - alcohol level, and impose longer license suspensions).
  • In most states, the existence of any personal injury caused by drunk driving elevates the offense to a felony. A death can trigger manslaughter or even, in a few states, murder charges.
• Back to Top

• 17.  What is a "rising BAC defense "?
  • In Arizona, it is unlawful to have an excessive blood-alcohol concentration (0.08% BAC) within two (2) hours of driving. Since it takes between 30 minutes and 3 hours for alcohol to be absorbed into the system, an individual's BAC may continue to rise for some time after he is stopped and arrested. The Arizona legislature has taken away affirmative defense of proving that a person was not at or over the legal limit at the time of driving.  However, proving that a driver was under the legal limit of 0.08% goes a long way towards convincing a jury to render a verdict of not-guilty.
  • Commonly, it is an hour or more after the stop when the blood, breath or urine test is given to the suspect. Assume that the result is .10%. If the suspect has continued to absorb alcohol since he was stopped, his BAC at the time he was driving may have been only .07%. In other words, the test result shows a blood-alcohol concentration above the legal limit -- but his actual BAC at the time of driving, and thus the crucial time was below.
• Back to Top

• 18.  What is "mouth alcohol "?
  • "Mouth alcohol" refers to the existence of any alcohol in the mouth or esophagus. If this is present during a breath test, then the results will be falsely high. This is because the breath machine assumes that the breath is from the lungs; for complex physiological reasons, its internal computer multiplies the amount of alcohol by 2100. Thus, even a tiny amount of alcohol breathed directly into the machine from the mouth or throat rather than from the lungs can have a significant impact.
  • Mouth alcohol can be caused in many ways. Belching, burping, hiccupping or vomiting within 20 minutes before taking the test can bring vapor from alcoholic beverages still in the stomach up into the mouth and throat. Taking a breath freshener can send a machine's reading way up (such products as Binaca and Listerine have alcohol in them); cough syrups and other products also contain alcohol. Dental bridges and dental caps can trap alcohol. Blood in the mouth from an injury is yet another source of inaccurate breath test results: breathed into the mouthpiece, any alcohol in the blood will be multiplied 2100 times. A chronic "reflux" condition from gastric distress or a hiatal hernia can cause elevated BAC readings.
• Back to Top

• 19.  What defenses are there in a DUI case?
  • Potential defenses in a given drunk driving case are almost limitless due to the complexities of the offense. Roughly speaking, however, the majority can be broken down into the following areas:
  • (1) Driving. Intoxication is not enough: the prosecution must also prove that the defendant was driving. This may be difficult if, as in the case of accidents, there are no witnesses to his being the driver of the vehicle.
  • (2) Probable cause. Evidence will be suppressed if the officer did not have legal cause to (a) stop, (b) detain, and (c) arrest. Sobriety roadblocks present particularly complex issues.
  • (3) Miranda. Incriminating statements may be suppressed if warnings were not given at the appropriate time.
  • (4) Implied consent warnings. If the officer did not advise you of the consequences of refusing to take a chemical test, or gave it incorrectly, in some states this may affect admissibility of the test results -- as well as the license suspension imposed by the motor vehicle department.
  • (5) "Under the influence". The officer's observations and opinions as to intoxication can be questioned -- the circumstances under which the field sobriety tests were given, for example, or the subjective (and predisposed) nature of what the officer considers as "failing". Too, witnesses can testify that you appeared to be sober.
  • (6) Blood-alcohol concentration. There exists a wide range of potential problems with blood, breath or urine testing. "Non-specific" analysis, for example: most breath machines will register many chemical compounds found on the human breath as alcohol. And breath machines assume a 2100-to-1 ratio in converting alcohol in the breath into alcohol in the blood; in fact, this ratio varies widely from person to person (and within a person from one moment to another). Radio frequency interference can result in inaccurate readings. These and other defects in analysis can be brought out in cross-examination of the state's expert witness, and/or the defense can hire its own forensic chemist.
  • (7) Testing during the absorptive phase. The blood, breath or urine test will be unreliable if done while you are still actively absorbing alcohol (it takes 30 minutes to three hours to complete absorption; this can be delayed if food is present in the stomach). Thus, drinking "one for the road" can cause inaccurate test results.
  • (8) Retrograde extrapolation. This refers to the requirement that the BAC be "related back" in time from the test to the driving (see question #17). Again, a number of complex physiological problems are involved here.
  • (9) Regulation of blood-alcohol testing. The prosecution must prove that the blood, breath or urine test complied with state requirements as to calibration, maintenance, etc.
  • (10) License suspension hearings. A number of issues can be raised in the context of an administrative hearing before the state's department of motor vehicles.
• Back to Top

• 20.  I have some questions about my DUI case. Where can I go for answers?
• Back to Top